WARNING : Long Blog entry - it's Tuesday, I have time.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I was curious about what my church's approach to the tsunami would be. So on Sunday, I went to church with anticipation - because I think it says alot about a church when you see how it handles things like this.
Well, my church (which shall remain nameless) gets a failing grade, at least from me. The focus was on the sermon, which was on "What should our response be?" A good question, but the sermon itself was pretty much a rehashing of Job, trying to
EXPLAIN why there is suffering. I was disappointed. It made me consider what I was hoping for.
My conclusions: It comes back to the whole modern / postmodern thing. I am not looking for a point by point explaination of why 150,000 people died. I do not need reasons or a rational explanation. I don't even think there is a way to understand such suffering, and I think we trivialize it when we try to fit it into one of our little boxes. Can't we accept that it's something horrible and painful and unexplainable? Can't we allow some of the mystery of God to remain? Must we make God fit into our understanding? According to my own meagre study, in basic terms, the 'modern' approach is a need for understanding, for undeniable truths to stand on. The 'postmodern' need is for an experience, an emotional connection. So my church took the modern road (as most churches do) and tried to explain what happened, and give us a step by step response of what to do. What did I want?
Well, last spring, Kathy and I went to a service in London, that we both felt was an incredible example of a postmodern response. (And, to clarify, this was not some radical church, it was a parish Church of England, with many families, small children and elderly. We went to visit one Sunday when we were in London, because I read the pastor's book in univeristy. We were expecting some big mega-church with a famous pastor, and instead found a small community in an old cathedral). It was the Sunday after the Madrid train bombing, which deeply affected many Europeans. There was no 5 point sermon, instead, they laid candles in the shape of a cross in the Nave, then they invited everyone to come quietly forward, take a rose and lay it around the cross, while a song of mourning played. It was deeply spiritual, very emotional, and had the element of mystery and majesty. It was an acknowledgement that something horrible and painful had happened, that we sympathazied and prayed for the victims, and that we called on God for mercy, even though we could not understand. I will forget a sermon in a week, but the prayers that filled that cathedral when we stood as the family of God in a circle around the candle cross and the 'fallen' roses, will never leave me.
So, while I left my church on Sunday disappointed in their response, I remembered the church in London, and I thought about all the churches around the world, who were in their own ways (modern or postmodern) were praying for the countries in S.E. Asia, and I felt peace that the body of Christ is still the body of Christ, in it's various forms.
I'd love to hear what all of your churches did on Sunday. What were the sermons about? Where did they tell you to send money? Was there any creative ways to mourn or pray? Please comment.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I've been torn over where to donate money to tsunami relief, as I am sure many of you are.
But I got an email from World Vision Canada that I found very encouraging, it says:
The Canadian government has announced that it will match every dollar donated by individuals until January 11, 2005. To give a gift that will bematched, dollar-for-dollar, please click here.
Of course, World Vision is a very trustworthy organization to give money to, and I believe it is a good use of our resources if we can have donations matched by the Canadian government. So if you are still looking for a place to give, check out the link and the work World Vision is doing.